John Mack - Newtown Supervisor

Home | What's New | Newsletter | Events & Meetings | Contact

Meet Mack Monday

Join Me for a Chat
Mack Meets Residents at the Corner Bakery Cafe
Before #COVID19!

Are you concerned about overdevelopment in Newtown, tax increases, traffic, quality of our roads,  preserving open space or about any issue that has or will come before the Board of Supervisors (BOS) and other township boards and commissions?

Feel free to attend one of my Meet Mack Monday (MMM) events that I host periodically, usually the 2nd Monday of the month before the first BOS meeting (refer to the Event Calendar for specific dates and access to registration form). I will inform you of items coming up for discussion at public meetings you may not be able to attend and that are not televised. I will listen to your concerns and together with other residents and business owners I will try to come up with solutions to problems that make sense for Newtown as a whole.

DISCLAIMER: Meet Mack Monday meetings are not official Newtown Township meetings. The opinions expressed at Meet Mack Monday events are solely those of John Mack and the attendees of the meeting and do not represent the opinions of any other entity.

Most Recent Meeting: July 11, 2022

The following is a summary of the discussion:

Lower Dolington Rd Trail Update

I summarized the timeline for this project, which starts in March, 2018, and ends in June 2022.

Q: What’s holding up this project?

A: Back in May 2022, after 2 months of delay, the township engineer notified the supervisors: “As you are aware, we have encountered some ‘unexpected utility conflicts’ during construction which impact the underground infiltration trenches designed as part of this project. This is predominately in the area between Stanford Place and Everett Drive. Lumens was scheduled to relocate their conduit last year, which became January, then April, and now possibly the end of May. [As of July 4, 2022, this has not yet happened!]

“Additionally, Newtown Artesian Water has water mains in different locations than what was confirmed with them during the design. The Contractor also delayed performing test pits, which is another issue.”

Q: How has the township responded to residents complaints about long abandoned construction barriers causing hazardous conditions, interfering with landscaping, etc.?

A: To date the Township has removed at least some of the garbage/litter, relocated barrels and netting to allow more pedestrian access to the intersection, and removed the netting laying on the ADA ramp, in order to comply with Federal law regarding maintaining the safety of ADA infrastructure.

Q: When will these barriers be removed? Should the township pay the contractors to come back and up the mess they left months ago?

A: It is unknown if and when these construction materials will be removed. The Township informed Supervisors that to do a cleanup would require a full crew to come back at additional expense. the Township Engineers estimated this would cost $800 - $1,000. I noted that the contract requires the construction company to maintain a clean site. Therefore, I am in favor of either requiring the company to come back and clean up at its expenses, or have the township pay to have this done ASAP considering the expected ongoing delays (see below).

Q: When will this project be completed?

A: On July 11, 2022, I met with the Township Engineer and the representatives from Lumen – the company responsible for relocating underground cables. Lumen was informed that this project is in a “not so happy place” by the engineers. Lumen was pressed on providing a timeline for the relocation of the fiber cables. It indicated it would put out a bid for the project, which involves a total of 15,000 feet of cable, immediately. Lumen estimated it would take 2-3 weeks to award the contract and 1-2 weeks to complete the job once it begins. Lumen has yet to provide a more detailed timeline, which was requested by the township engineers. Work on the trail can continue ONLY when the cable project is completed at least between Frost Lane and Everett Drive. Once it does continue, it may take several months to complete, hopefully before winter sets in!

It is imperative, IMHO, that residents be kept well-informed throughout the process. This does NOT mean that all residents in the area be informed via mail. I proposes that HOA representatives be notified directly. Previously, the township expected that residents would attend township meetings to learn what’s going on. Obviously, this communication channel does not work.

Background information:

Where’s Wawa?

Recall that Wawa at the last minute declined to show up at the May 11, 2022, without providing any reason (read "Newtown Wawa Developers Just Stood Up Supervisors at a Big Meeting. What Does This Mean for the Project?"). The Twp allowed an extension to 8/15 to hear and vote on the project and TENTATIVELY scheduled a hearing at the 8/10 BOS meeting.

There was much discussion about the pros and cons of approving this application. One resident noted that if the supervisors do not approve Wawa’s plan, it will be appealed and then, as usual, lose. How much can we afford to fight this?

I mentioned that by law supervisor could limit the hours of operation – what I call the “poison pill.” See page 41 of the 2022 BOS Chronicle. At least one resident is looking to being able to buy gas at any time of the day.

There was much discussion regarding pedestrian and cyclist safety, especially when crossing the Bypass and coming west down Lower Silverlake Rd. I noted that Middletown Township is expecting cyclists would be crossing Woodbourne Rd heading to the proposed Wawa on Lower Silverlake Rd. To mitigate the danger, new traffic signals are coming to Woodbourne Road's intersection with both Swift and Lower Silver Lake roads by the fall or winter (read “New Traffic Lights Set for Woodbourne Road Near Newtown Bypass”).

As an aside, I mentioned that at least one cyclist expressed concern regarding cyclist safety on North Sycamore Street. 

Whatever the pros and cons (read “Super Wawa Survey Comments”), having the hearing on August 15 is UNACCEPTABLE! At least one supervisor and many residents will be away on vacation that day. This hearing should be held AFTER Labor Day to assure that residents have an opportunity to attend and make comments.

Left Turn Signage at Newtown-Yardley Rd/Bypass Intersection

Q: Is new, additional signage needed to prevent left turn accidents?

A: According to “Newtown-Yardley Road Left Turn Sign Survey Results” at least 80% of respondents say “Yes, definitely!”

Q: What did PennDOT think of this idea?

A: A PennDOT signage official thought additional signage might be necessary, but the township must apply for a permit and would be responsible for installing the sign (see concept below):

Q: What did the Newtown traffic engineer have to say about it?

A: “I’ve taken a look at the current PennDOT permit plan for the signalized intersection at the Newtown Bypass & Newtown-Yardley Rd.   The plan shows existing overhead lane use signs on the southbound approach just before the intersection along with a series of lane use arrows and extended lane markings (dashed lines) that delineate the left turn movements through the intersection.

“These features are compliant with the current standards and any additional signage would supplement those specified PennDOT requirements.

“I understand that the intersection’s pavement markings are scheduled to be restored as part of this year’s road program. I’d expect the fresh extended lane markings to remedy any current issues with double left-turn conflicts.   

“If an issue exists after the markings are restored, the need for additional signage can be revisited. However, I would also recommend carefully considering the decision to mount additional signage to an existing traffic signal mast arm.  The items for consideration are as follows:   

  • Traffic signal poles and mast arms are structural units designed for specific conditions.  Installing additional overhead signage increases wind load on the arm.  The specifications of the existing pole should be reviewed to ensure the added signage does not exceed the current design parameters.
  • On two-lane approaches, the MUTCD and PennDOT regulations specify post-mounted lane use control signage. Overhead signage is allowed but not required. To limit cost and ease maintenance, post-mounted signs could also be installed to supplement the existing conditions.
  • If added overhead signing is installed, will it spark an undesirable precedent for other locations within the Township?  

My Response:

“I need some time to digest this, but I am concerned that our traffic engineer may think If added overhead signing is installed, that it may "spark an undesirable precedent for other locations within the Township." Safety improvements - such as this, which even PennDOT says may be helpful, should never be considered an "undesirable precedent," IMHO. I am surprised he did not say that when we made pedestrian safety improvements on N Sycamore St. I believe that set a  "desirable precedent."

More information:

Newtown Ambulance Squad

A resident asked about the Newtown Ambulance Squad (NAS), which is expected to give a financial report at July 13, BOS meeting.

I informed attendees that the NAS is asking for an additional 0.5 millage Newtown Township tax dedicated to NAS. Based on a home with a market value of $400,000 and an assessed value of $43,600 (the approximate average home market/assessed value in Newtown Township in 2018), the current EMS tax for the average Newtown Twp homeowner is 0.5 X 43.6 = $21.80 per year. So an additional 0.5 millage would also be $21.80 for a new total of $43.60.

I informed attendees that this require a ballor referendum and that the BOS will consider authorizing that at its July 13, 2022, meeting. I was not sure if this referendum would appear on the November 2022 ballot or if it would be better to have this on the 2023 ballot when 2 supervisors are up for re-election.

I noted that Newtown Township currently provides $171,000 (about $8.75 per resident) in annual funding to the NAS, whereas Newtown Borough only contributes $15,000 (about $6.67 per resident) annually. My comment was that the Borough should pay more.

Newtown Township-Newtown Borough Fire Services Agreement

I briefly summarized the FINAL Agreement between the Township and Borough regarding paid fire services provided by the Newtown Township Emergency Services (EMS) Department. The agreement states: “In exchange for the Township providing the Services to the Borough, the Borough shall pay the Township compensation. The Compensation for calendar year 2022 shall be One Hundred Fifty-Four Thousand, Three Hundred Sixty-Five Dollars ($154,365.00), $147,155 of which is base Compensation and $7,210 of which is related to capital expense of purchasing a command vehicle. This will be paid monthly retroactive to January 2022. The agreement is for 3 years and “shall increase by a factor of five percent (5%)” each year after the first.

An attendee – who was a volunteer fireman – noted that soon there will be no volunteer fire departments. I responded that anticipating that, at the January 12, 2022, Newtown Board of Supervisors (BOS) public meeting, Fire Chief Glenn Forsyth spoke about the reason why he is seeking approval to submit a third application to FEMA for a Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) grant. If awarded, the grant would cover the expenses of 3 additional EMS paid firefighters for 3 years. This would allow the EMS to cover weekends as well as weekdays. The volunteers would still be needed to cover the nights shifts (6 PM to 6 AM, I believe) every day of the week.

The first two applications were rejected because FEMA felt that the township did not have an adequate source of revenue to pay for the new firefighters after 3 years. Of course, to address that problem taxes would need to be increased.

More: “The Future of Newtown Township's Paid Fire Services”

Items on the Agenda That Were NOT Discussed Due to Lack of Time

Preview of the July 13, 2022, Board of Supervisors Meeting: Will Newtown pass a resolution supporting a woman’s right to abortion? (e.g., as in: “Abortion Rights Ordinance in Radnor Township Stops Police From Investigating Abortion Cases”). 

Joint Zoning Council (JZC) Topics:  See July 7, 2022, JZC Meeting Highlights for details:

Return to Top...

Past Meetings
TwitterFacebookLinkedInEmail